Location: Ireland
Location: Yeoford, Nr. Crediton
| Arizona wrote: |
|
Hi All
Well as the subject says: Datastorm F3 V Alden Netmaster 90 We spend 6 weeks on mainland Europe each summer, internet access is very important as we have to keep business ticking over/running smoothly while we're away. We have managed the last 3 years with blackberries etc but it nearly always seems to be hassle and/or expensive. Spending time looking for wifi spots, sitting in McDonalds car parks just add stress to our summer. It is getting easier as the years go by. Are just wondering whether take the plunge and invest the money in one of the above. With this in mind are now looking for advice. What are the pros & cons, advantages/disadvantages of one system over the other: Is the Datastorm worth all the extra money? Will the area covered by Alden widen? Would we just be better keeping our money and getting a Three phone? What do ya'll think? Regards Arizona |
Location: North Notts
| Duadua wrote: |
|
Arizona
Like you perhaps, I reasoned I could extend my time away in Europe by keeping in touch with work if I had satisfactory internet access. The only choice when I was looking was the Datastorm F3 or the BGAN. The per Megabyte transmission costs for the latter were off putting. The downside re the Datastorm, had been not only the capital cost but the monthly subscription cost for unlimited access, which had only been available for a period of 12 months at a time, regardless of how many weeks or months the MH might not be used in a year. This arrangement has changed and now I understand I can purchase 1 months airtime at a time. So for your 6 weeks in Europe you might only need to pay for say 2 months airtime now. I have no comments to make about the Alden Netmaster 90 as I am unfamiliar with it. I can confirm that the F3 can be set up to receive 2 different Sat TV channels at the same time, with twin LNB's, i.e. working front and rear TVs on different channels at the same time, if you wish, whilst also allowing full internet access. This, to an extent, helped to partially offset in my mind the cost since a further dedicated Sat TV system is not required. We are not big TV people but I have been aware that our children might prefer the option of TV on dark or rainy days etc. I and others on this forum have had reliability problems with the F3, and I will never know whether all will now be OK again or not. Currently I am not on air as we are not using the MH and so there are no longer any running costs whilst the MH is "off the road". When it does work it is fantastic, but it can be frustrating when not knowing why it is not working like anything else electronic. In the States it is relied upon by many MH'ers for internet access. I have also experimented with Voip calls, again to partially at least further offset some of the costs against what would have been costly mobile phone charges. It works very well without any further hardware for outgoing calls using Skype and a Philips cordless Voip phone, which you can connect directly to a modem, so that you do not need to switch a computer on to make a call. Incoming calls however do not work, as they are broken up. Apparently you can upgrade your connection to allow unbroken incoming calls. So if telephone calls are important as well I might suggest you receive an incoming diverted call to your mobile and agree to quickly call them back using the Skype phone. By the way, the monthly airtime agreement is not required to receive Sat TV. The airtime agreement is only required for internet access. I think you will find there is an F3 available for purchase from Gromett on this forum if you are interested? http://www.motorhomefacts.com/ftopicp-389062-.html#389062 Hope the above is of some use. |
Location: Near Orly Airport
Location: Ireland
All times are GMT + 1 Hour