|
 |
|
 |
 |
Shocking Security. |
 |
Posted: Thu Dec 07, 2006 5:53 pm |
 |
|
torquayite |
|
 |
| |
| Joined: |
| Posts: 16 |
|
| MH: |
|
Medals: None
|
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
| Posts Left: 5 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
I am considering fitting an electric fencing energiser inside my van, having been burgled repeatedly.
The energiser converts 12 volts to 10000 volts but with almost zero current, and gives a horse or cow or human a big but supposedly harmless shock.
Wired to mats inside each door and to a cover on each seat, would anyone be able to get in to the van?
If they were warned by signs on each door, would they still chance it?
The chap who has already done it leaves his doors unlocked....why have your locks damaged?
He tested the system by betting a young man a tenner he could not drive his camper away even if he had the keys.
The pretend miscreant jumped in and out.....and refused to get in again.
My son thinks the downside is that if any ne-er-do-well got a shock, he may be infuriated and would damage the vehicle in retaliation.
Any comments would be appreciated.
An energiser costs about £55, seemingly a cheap way to prevent theft.
Obviously, an On/Off switch would be located externally so you could disarm the system.
Peter. |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
The following members of MHF thanked torquayite for this posting
|
|
|
 |
shock system |
 |
Posted: Thu Dec 07, 2006 5:56 pm |
 |
|
torquayite |
|
 |
| |
| Joined: |
| Posts: 16 |
|
| MH: |
|
Medals: None
|
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
| Posts Left: 5 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
Oh, I forgot.
Any lawyers out there?
Knowing how one must be nice to criminals, is this legal?
Peter. |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
The following members of MHF thanked torquayite for this posting
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 07, 2006 5:56 pm |
 |
|
tonyt |
|
 |
| |
| Joined: May 25, 2005 |
| Posts: 1372 |
|
| MH: VW Holdsworth Villa |
| Location: Essex |
Medals: None
|
|

|
Status: Offline |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
| I like the theory of it and look forward to the lively debate this posting is likely to generate. |
|
______________________________________________________________ Tony
..... and the First Prize is a meal-for-two at McDonalds - the Second Prize is a meal-for-four at McDonalds. |
|
|
|
 |
|
The following members of MHF thanked tonyt for this posting
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 07, 2006 5:57 pm |
 |
|
Grizzly |
|
 |
| |
| Joined: May 09, 2005 |
| Posts: 5590 |
|
| MH: Bessacarr E530 |
| Location: Oxfordshire |
Medals: None
|
|

|
Status: Offline |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
I think that what you plan is illegal Peter. It's setting a man-trap and, if you do kill anyone ( heart stops due to large current ?) or injure them then you are in big trouble.
Tempting though it sounds I think you'd be safer with more conventional alarms.
G |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
The following members of MHF thanked Grizzly for this posting
|
|
|
 |
Try a Tiger! |
 |
Posted: Thu Dec 07, 2006 6:02 pm |
 |
|
cobaltkoala |
|
 |
| |
| Joined: Sep 11, 2006 |
| Posts: 281 |
|
| MH: Autoquest 600 |
| Location: BRISTOL |
Medals: None
|
|

|
Status: Offline |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
Whilst this to me seems a perfectly acceptable idea, after all only those who shouldn't be there would be effected, you must remember the eggshell skull principle of law.
If the criminal had an underlying condition that meant even the small shock, whether physical or indeed simply psychological, stimulated a reaction in the criminal that proved to injure or even kill them, you would be held responsible. In fact if you hit one of them with a peanut and they dies from an alergic reaction 'theoretically' it would still be deemed as your responsibility.
Perhaps if you added a bengal tiger to the cab therefore ensuring the evidence was eaten all may be well. |
|
______________________________________________________________ Kevin, Pauline, Jamie & Meegan
´Izzy The Lady Dog´
cobaltkoala
"Lifes too short, just do it!"
Only registered users can see links on our Forum Join Now or Login |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
The following members of MHF thanked cobaltkoala for this posting
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 07, 2006 6:07 pm |
 |
|
Geo |
|
 |
| |
| Joined: Mar 05, 2006 |
| Posts: 2012 |
|
| MH: RV Coachmen Mirada |
| Location: Mansfield,Notts ,Robin Hood Country |
Medals: None
|
|

|
Status: Offline |
|
| Posts Left: 0 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
Yes I think if I were a burglar,
and suffered the shock treatment, I would utterly and totaly destroy your pride and joy, absolutely no doubt about it |
|
______________________________________________________________ Welcome to the Dark Side where the Sun shines brightest
Advice is what we ask for when we already know the answer but wish we didn´t. |
|
|
|
 |
|
The following members of MHF thanked Geo for this posting
|
|
|
 |
shocking |
 |
Posted: Thu Dec 07, 2006 6:14 pm |
 |
|
torquayite |
|
 |
| |
| Joined: |
| Posts: 16 |
|
| MH: |
|
Medals: None
|
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
| Posts Left: 5 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
I have heard that a mantrap is illegal. However, I have investigated the use of these as electric fences and found that, if used alongside public access areas, notices placed at reasonable intervals absolve the farmer from blame if you decide to touch his fencing.
Also, a branch of a well known building materials company experienced frequent thefts at night, ringed their premises with a suitably "Noticed" electric fence, and have since not had one theft.
If I place a notice in three languages on each door warning that the interior is wired, that can not be a trap.
A challenge, perhaps, but certainly not a trap.
Peter. |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
The following members of MHF thanked torquayite for this posting
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 07, 2006 6:18 pm |
 |
|
peejay |
| Campsite DB Admin |
 |
| |
| Joined: May 10, 2005 |
| Posts: 4934 |
|
| MH: Hymer B504 |
| Location: Deepest Lincolnshire |
Medals: None
|
|

|
Status: Online |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
| Quote:
|
|
If I place a notice in three languages on each door
|
I think you might need a few more than 3 languages
pete |
|
______________________________________________________________
B504 |
|
|
|
 |
|
The following members of MHF thanked peejay for this posting
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 07, 2006 6:23 pm |
 |
|
Geo |
|
 |
| |
| Joined: Mar 05, 2006 |
| Posts: 2012 |
|
| MH: RV Coachmen Mirada |
| Location: Mansfield,Notts ,Robin Hood Country |
Medals: None
|
|

|
Status: Offline |
|
| Posts Left: 0 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
| Quote:
|
|
I think you might need a few more than 3 languages
|
And a Good Lawyer |
|
______________________________________________________________ Welcome to the Dark Side where the Sun shines brightest
Advice is what we ask for when we already know the answer but wish we didn´t. |
|
|
|
 |
|
The following members of MHF thanked Geo for this posting
|
|
|
 |
Re: shocking |
 |
Posted: Thu Dec 07, 2006 6:30 pm |
 |
|
Grizzly |
|
 |
| |
| Joined: May 09, 2005 |
| Posts: 5590 |
|
| MH: Bessacarr E530 |
| Location: Oxfordshire |
Medals: None
|
|

|
Status: Offline |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
| torquayite wrote:
|
However, I have investigated the use of these as electric fences and found that, if used alongside public access areas, notices placed at reasonable intervals absolve the farmer from blame if you decide to touch his fencing.
Also, a branch of a well known building materials company experienced frequent thefts at night, ringed their premises with a suitably "Noticed" electric fence, and have since not had one theft.
If I place a notice in three languages on each door warning that the interior is wired, that can not be a trap.
A challenge, perhaps, but certainly not a trap.
Peter.
|
An electric fence used for the reason that a farmer normally uses it - ie to stop animals straying - is one thing. Even with notices however I suspect that if someone touches it accidentally and is injured they might have a case against the farmer. This could be if | | | | | | | |