|
 |
|
 |
 |
Would this work as additional security ? |
 |
Posted: Sun Jun 24, 2007 11:54 am |
 |
|
Grizzly |
|
 |
| |
| Joined: May 09, 2005 |
| Posts: 5071 |
|
| MH: Bessacarr E530 |
| Location: Oxfordshire |
Medals: None
|
|

|
Status: Offline |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
The story of the motorhome and dogs stolen in France is a worrying tale.
We usually shop together and leave the van parked while we go sight-seeing.
We always leave the alarms on but have seen car alarms totally ignored.
It started me wondering if leaving one of a pair of walkie talkies in the van and taking the other one with you would work. Given a pair with 2-3 km range and both switched on you would certainly be able to hear the engine start, sounds of broken glass, dogs barking and any other signs that all was not well. At the very least you'd be able to get back to your van possibly to prevent it being stolen or at least to get witness statements while there is anyone there to have seen it driven away.
Signs could be left on the van that it is wireless protected.
I've never used these walkie talkies so I don't know what I'm talking about but just wandered.
G |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
The following members of MHF thanked Grizzly for this posting
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 24, 2007 12:06 pm |
 |
|
stickey |
|
 |
| |
| Joined: May 07, 2007 |
| Posts: 1001 |
|
| MH: Auto sleeper Symbol |
| Location: Burton upon Trent |
Medals: None
|
|

|
Status: Offline |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
I would buy a Strikeback if I were you. Mine sends me a text message if the alarm is activated and some have the facility to start when the large nasty thief is standing over you but once stopped it is immobilised. There are lots of other options which we don't want to give away but with the phone option you have a certain amount of control over the alarm. You gets what you pay for,
Regards,
Chris V |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
The following members of MHF thanked stickey for this posting
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
Posted: Sun Jun 24, 2007 1:08 pm |
 |
|
Dazzer |
|
 |
| |
| Joined: Oct 15, 2006 |
| Posts: 643 |
|
| MH: Coachmen Concord 300TS |
| Location: Northwest England |
Medals: None
|
|

|
Status: Offline |
|
| Posts Left: 0 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
From what ive seen of the cheapy walkie talkies youd be lucky to get any reception at all inside the supermarket. They work ok in wide open spaces but are rubbish as soon are you go near a building with them. Add to that the interference you would get from one handset been inside a vehicle and its a none starter me thinks!!
Better spending your money on a decent immobiliser/alarm with a "soundbomb" fitted inside the vehicle that is so loud it makes the ears of anyone inside the vehicle bleed (result!!!!) and renders then deaf for the rest of their natural lives (just a shame it cant blind and sterilise them at the same time!!)
As previously said you gets what you pay for  |
|
______________________________________________________________ Dazzer
If folks dont have a smile for you, give em one of yours!!! |
|
|
|
 |
|
The following members of MHF thanked Dazzer for this posting
|
|
|
 |
Re: Would this work as additional security ? |
 |
Posted: Sun Jun 24, 2007 2:30 pm |
 |
|
JockandRita |
|
 |
| |
| Joined: Jun 01, 2005 |
| Posts: 2256 |
|
| MH: Hymer E690 |
| Location: Lincs/Cambs border |
Medals: None
|
|

|
Status: Offline |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
| Grizzly wrote:
|
It started me wondering if leaving one of a pair of walkie talkies in the van and taking the other one with you would work. Given a pair with 2-3 km range and both switched on you would certainly be able to hear the engine start, sounds of broken glass, dogs barking and any other signs that all was not well. At the very least you'd be able to get back to your van possibly to prevent it being stolen or at least to get witness statements while there is anyone there to have seen it driven away.
Signs could be left on the van that it is wireless protected.
I've never used these walkie talkies so I don't know what I'm talking about but just wandered.
G
|
Hi Grizzly,
This is a technique I have used in the past when, as the driver, I have had to leave the Fire appliance unattended, but still needed to hear messages on the main radio scheme.
I jammed the transmit button in the open position, and could hear the messages that came in.
Two downsides are.....
1...The radio handset gets hot due to the power it is using whilst in the transmitting mode for more than a few minutes.
2...Some radio handsets only allow you to transmit for a limited time, before the need to release, and re-press the button to transmit again.
So, your idea is good in theory, but may not be achieveable in practical terms, due to the constraints above, and depending on the "walkie talkie/radio handset specifications.
I hope that this is of help.
Jock. |
|
______________________________________________________________ It is better to get there safely, than not at all
|
|
|
|
 |
|
The following members of MHF thanked JockandRita for this posting
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 24, 2007 3:03 pm |
 |
|
Grizzly |
|
 |
| |
| Joined: May 09, 2005 |
| Posts: 5071 |
|
| MH: Bessacarr E530 |
| Location: Oxfordshire |
Medals: None
|
|

|
Status: Offline |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
Thanks everyone...not it seems a winner !
The Zimbabwean way to protect a precious car was to spring load a crossbow bolt into the centre of the steering wheel, released when pressure was applied to the seat. I suspect there would have been no need for an amplifier had that been activated.
A little extreme however and I'm sure the CC would not approve !
G |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
The following members of MHF thanked Grizzly for this posting
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 24, 2007 3:21 pm |
 |
|
JockandRita |
|
 |
| |
| Joined: Jun 01, 2005 |
| Posts: 2256 |
|
| MH: Hymer E690 |
| Location: Lincs/Cambs border |
Medals: None
|
|

|
Status: Offline |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
| Dazzer wrote:
|
Better spending your money on a decent immobiliser/alarm with a "soundbomb" fitted inside the vehicle that is so loud it makes the ears of anyone inside the vehicle bleed (result!!!!) and renders then deaf for the rest of their natural lives (just a shame it cant blind and sterilise them at the same time!!)
As previously said you gets what you pay for
|
Hi Dazzer,
I was going to ask you, where I could get a hold of the "soundbomb", but then I remembered how forgetful I can be sometimes, and would probably end up blowing my own ears to bits.
Same goes for the "crossbow" set up Grizzly.
Jock. |
|
______________________________________________________________ It is better to get there safely, than not at all
|
|
|
|
 |
|
The following members of MHF thanked JockandRita for this posting
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 24, 2007 3:46 pm |
 |
|
Geo |
|
 |
| |
| Joined: Mar 05, 2006 |
| Posts: 2012 |
|
| MH: RV Coachmen Mirada |
| Location: Mansfield,Notts ,Robin Hood Country |
Medals: None
|
|

|
Status: Offline |
|
| Posts Left: 0 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
Fit Both Jock, then Rita wont be able to hear you scream as the bolt goes through your chest,
The cheapest and most effective antitheft idea, is to fit a hidden fuel tap, this allows the thief to start and drive away your MH with confidence, only to break down in the most incoveiant place, attracting all the wrong attention, and you will more than likely have the police there to sort out the abandond vehicle in minuets,
Works evey time, and if you forget to turn it on well it wont take 5 seconds to sort will it
Geo |
|
______________________________________________________________ Welcome to the Dark Side where the Sun shines brightest
Advice is what we ask for when we already know the answer but wish we didnīt. |
|
|
|
 |
|
The following members of MHF thanked Geo for this posting
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 24, 2007 4:09 pm |
 |
|
JockandRita |
|
 |
| |
| Joined: Jun 01, 2005 |
| Posts: 2256 |
|
| MH: Hymer E690 |
| Location: Lincs/Cambs border |
Medals: None
|
|

|
Status: Offline |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
| Geo wrote:
|
Fit Both Jock, then Rita wont be able to hear you scream as the bolt goes through your chest,
Geo
|
Now there's a rather novel idea.
I like the "fuel tap" tip. Even easier if it is an electric fuel pump, (switch instead).
On a previous car, I wired in a hidden switch for the fuel solenoid. It worked a treat.
Jock. |
|
______________________________________________________________ It is better to get there safely, than not at all
|
|
|
|
 |
|
The following members of MHF thanked JockandRita for this posting
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 24, 2007 4:58 pm |
 |
|
Geo |
|
 |
| |
| Joined: Mar 05, 2006 |
| Posts: 2012 |
|
| MH: RV Coachmen Mirada |
| Location: Mansfield,Notts ,Robin Hood Country |
Medals: None
|
|

|
Status: Offline |
|
| Posts Left: 0 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
The tap is a better option Jock with this method you let them move it a short distance and it konks,=Runaway and it gets noticed halfway across a juction
using the electric soleniod it wont start = rip radio out and Nick TV instead
Geo |
|
______________________________________________________________ Welcome to the Dark Side where the Sun shines brightest
Advice is what we ask for when we already know the answer but wish we didnīt. |
|
|
|
 |
| | | | |