UK Motorhome Information, Motorhome fun, American RV Forums, Articles, Reviews, Sales, Campsites Paramount Performance
Advertise Here
  Click here to Create an account Motorhome News RSS Feed ::  Home  ::  Subscriptions  ::  Your Account  ::  Forums ::  Directory::  Editorial  :: Motorhome Forums RSS Feed   Add to Google
Motorhome Facts :: View topic - seat belt laws in the rear
 
Log in Register Forum FAQ Memberlist Search

BookmarksBookmarks  •  Watched TopicsWatched Topics  •  Arcade  •  Attachments  •  Buddy List  •  Ranks  •  Rules  •  Smilies List  •  Stats  •  
Forums Staff  • Medals  •  Courthouse
Google  
Sponsor this forum
>> Welcome to Motorhome Facts!

You are a Guest, please Join now to allow full access to the website and be part of our community. You can register by clicking the "Click Here to create an account" link at the top left of the page under our Logo


Latest News
Next Rally is @ Tertia Trust - Cleethorpes, Lincolnshire Coast on 24/07/2008 in lincolnshire
Motorhome Facts Forum Index -> Generic Hints & Tips -> AutoTrail -> seat belt laws in the rear Goto page Previous  1, 2
Post new topic  Reply to topic   Printer-friendly version co.mments Facebook del.icio.us digg blogmarks blinklist feed me links Furl Linkagogo Reddit Shadows Smarking simpy Spurl meneame technorati Yahoo Google :: :: View previous topic :: View next topic 
356183 PostPosted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 9:13 pm Thank this member for this postReply with quote
Briarose Subscriber 21/10/2008 
 
Joined: Oct 09, 2007
Posts: 942
Thanked 54 times in 52 posts

MH: Swift Bolero

Medals: None
blank.gif

Status: Offline
Events Attended:1




GerryD wrote:
The simple answer is that if you do not have seat belts then your insurance company will not provide cover. If any part of the vehicle or persons or goods carried in it are not covered then it can be deemed that the whole vehicle does not have cover. In that case you can be prosecuted for having no insurance.
Also, no insurance company will nowadays cover any passenger in a sideways facing seat.
In other words don't do it.
Surely common sense should prevail. Just because these vehicles cover lower mileage and are likely to be better maintained by their owners does not mean that they are exempt from accidents. And, please dont anybody jump in and say that a MH driver will take more care. All accidents are down to the other driver.


I am not sure this is true see this post

Quote:
Posted: 2008-01-08, 13:42:37

Chascass



Joined: May 10, 2007
Posts: 205
Thanked 13 times in 13 posts


MH: Autotrail Cheyenne 660se
Location: Co Durham

Medals: None



Status: Offline


Events Attended:1







For what it's worth, I have just put the phone down after being assured by Saga that I am insured to carry the amount of people the motor home is designed to sleep ( in my case 6 ) respective of how meany seat belts the van has ( in my case 2 ) my V5 also states 2 seats.

Charlie


In the very same thing discussed a week ago in the Swift forum, my friend also rang Autotrail a few days ago to ask their opinion, the guy she spoke to said and I quote ' if you have a 6 berth and are carrying 6 passengers including the front two passenger seats, at this moment in time it wouldn't be against the law' he also referred to the driver carrying them in a responsible way and not overloading the motorhome.

Best to check with your own insurance company I think.
View user's profile Send private message
356190 PostPosted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 9:21 pm Thank this member for this postReply with quote
GerryD Subscriber 10/10/2008 
 
Joined: Sep 20, 2007
Posts: 895
Thanked 107 times in 105 posts

MH: CI Carioca 705
Location: Bedfordshire

Medals: None
blank.gif

Status: Offline
Events Attended:1




Pusser, like me you are being forced kicking and screaming into this wonderful namby-pamby PC life.
This probably explains why the coastguard resigned this week following complaints that he did not follow safety regulations before saving a life.

Paperwork is now more important than life.

God, how I regret the danger, pain and stress that I must have caused to my parents, relatives and anyone else that knew me every time I climbed a tree when I was a kid.

This is not in any way aimed at any person or perfession that may be affected by my views or lack of consideration in sending this post.

Seriously, however, I do agree with the seatbelt regulations and would never support anybody who put a passenger in a non-belted seat.
View user's profile Send private message
356195 PostPosted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 9:27 pm Thank this member for this postReply with quote
GerryD Subscriber 10/10/2008 
 
Joined: Sep 20, 2007
Posts: 895
Thanked 107 times in 105 posts

MH: CI Carioca 705
Location: Bedfordshire

Medals: None
blank.gif

Status: Offline
Events Attended:1




Briarose wrote:
GerryD wrote:
The simple answer is that if you do not have seat belts then your insurance company will not provide cover. If any part of the vehicle or persons or goods carried in it are not covered then it can be deemed that the whole vehicle does not have cover. In that case you can be prosecuted for having no insurance.
Also, no insurance company will nowadays cover any passenger in a sideways facing seat.
In other words don't do it.
Surely common sense should prevail. Just because these vehicles cover lower mileage and are likely to be better maintained by their owners does not mean that they are exempt from accidents. And, please dont anybody jump in and say that a MH driver will take more care. All accidents are down to the other driver.


I am not sure this is true see this post

Quote:
Posted: 2008-01-08, 13:42:37

Chascass



Joined: May 10, 2007
Posts: 205
Thanked 13 times in 13 posts


MH: Autotrail Cheyenne 660se
Location: Co Durham

Medals: None



Status: Offline


Events Attended:1







For what it's worth, I have just put the phone down after being assured by Saga that I am insured to carry the amount of people the motor home is designed to sleep ( in my case 6 ) respective of how meany seat belts the van has ( in my case 2 ) my V5 also states 2 seats.

Charlie


In the very same thing discussed a week ago in the Swift forum, my friend also rang Autotrail a few days ago to ask their opinion, the guy she spoke to said and I quote ' if you have a 6 berth and are carrying 6 passengers including the front two passenger seats, at this moment in time it wouldn't be against the law' he also referred to the driver carrying them in a responsible way and not overloading the motorhome.

Best to check with your own insurance company I think.

Briarrose,
Absolutely correct, and it will only be true if the insurance put that into writing as part of your policy.
My betting is that they won't.
A few words over the phone have little effect after an accident. The important point is the number of seats under type approval.

Regards,
Gerry
View user's profile Send private message
356196 PostPosted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 9:28 pm Thank this member for this postReply with quote
Briarose Subscriber 21/10/2008 
 
Joined: Oct 09, 2007
Posts: 942
Thanked 54 times in 52 posts

MH: Swift Bolero

Medals: None
blank.gif

Status: Offline
Events Attended:1




Discussion can be found
Only registered users can see links on our Forum
Join Now or Login
if you haven't already seen it Wink
View user's profile Send private message
356238 PostPosted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 10:16 pm Thank this member for this postReply with quote
carolgavin Subscriber 26/02/2009 
Quiz Queen
 
Joined: May 09, 2005
Posts: 1852
Thanked 160 times in 153 posts

MH: White one!
Location: lanarkshire

Medals: None
scotland.gif

Status: Offline
Events Attended:1




Pusser wrote:

Are we not being particularly uneven minded and having double standards and while accepting there are dangers, are there similar dangers which for some reason we accept without question.


Probably but then tis not you or I who makes the rulesies petal!!!!
Why don't you start a new thread on how you would change/adapt the current laws to ensure no double standards or interpretation problems by police.
One reason we got rid of our Lunar is because it only had two belted seats U lounge at back. It was a 4 berth, not illegal for our sons to travel but highly questionable with a view to safety. That is why we really only did short trips and took the car!!! We did not have an accident in that time but if we had, well the consequences for our boys was not good. Why did we buy it?? Good deal, good trade in and FIL with a desperate need to spend money. My reaction on seeing it for the first time was choice, but it was done. Worry over safety prompted us into changing it.
Was it dangerous?? Did not ever want to have the accident to find out!!!!!

______________________________________________________________
WeŽre busy doing nothing, working the whole day through, trying to find lots of things not to do.
WeŽre busy going nowhere isnŽt it just a crime.WeŽd like to be unhappy but we never do have the time
Only registered users can see links on our Forum
Join Now or Login

Spreadsheet here.
Only registered users can see links on our Forum
Join Now or Login
View user's profile Send private message
  Motorhome Facts Forum Index -> AutoTrail
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum
All times are GMT + 1 Hour  
Page 2 of 2  
Goto page Previous  1, 2
  
  
Go to MAIN SITE Front Page
 Post new topic  Reply to topic   Printer-friendly version
 




phpBB © 2001-2003 phpBB Group
Forums ©


UK Motorhomes, Motorhome, Motorhoming, Motorcaravanning, Campervan.
Furbabies Pet Shop || Motorhome Accessories || Motorhome Directory || Labrador Dogs || Pet Forums || Peugeot || Caravans || Discount Gifts || Baby Forums
PHP - Nuke Copyright © 2004