You are a Guest, please Join now to allow full access to the website and be part of our community. You can register by clicking the "Click Here to create an account" link at the top left of the page under our Logo
I'm new, if you've seen this question before - apologies but I've looked and I can't see a discussion on this
I've got a Rimor Kat5 (07) with a Transit cab 140hp. The mpg is terrible.
When loaded ( I use it for motocross) with 2 adults & 2 children, 2 bikes ( 1 @ 95kg the other 75kg), full domestic water 100lt and full wash tanks 250lt it will do less than 20mpg on the motorway at a steady 60mph on an 'A' road this might get up to 22mpg at speeds between 40-50mph.
When unloaded (just the driver) on the motorway - same 60mph it does just under 22mpg and the best I've had on an A road at 55mph is 23.9mpg.
(It went beach under a re-call for suspension to a Ford dealers last year and the ignition was re-mapped but this made little difference)
I thought I'd get over 25mpg at least as this is what the older 135hp model does.
Am I expecting too much ?
Any solutions?
The following members of MHF thanked mxjb for this posting
i had on 2006 transit based unit with 2.4 135bhp engine only ever managed 19-20mpg.
I thing the final drive was too low, causing higher revs of the engine in 6th gear.See what the revs are at 60mph and compare with other transit owners!
The following members of MHF thanked jackc for this posting
We have the modern transit 125hp engine on a van which is close to 2700kg when loaded. Its a high top conversion, 2 people, bikes, etc.
Driving at speed limit and not hanging around, we get 30-32mpg
Engine only just clocked 10,000 so not loose yet
______________________________________________________________ Ryan and Mel. Our website
Only registered users can see links on our Forum Join Now or Login
has all our details on with pics of our van and antics
NOTE: Everything I post is my opinion, may or may not be correct so please check before making decisions based upon it. Corrections welcome, afterall we´re all here to learn.
The following members of MHF thanked ActiveCampers for this posting
Not sure if this will work ,but it worked very well on my vivaro ,try and have your engine re-mapped .This can be set up to increase your mid range to improve your mpg.
The following members of MHF thanked multi-fit for this posting
Hi, We have the Transit 140 RWD twin wheels and got the same MPG as your getting, we took it in to have it checked over, that nothing was causing it and got it back but only gained about 1-2 MPG.
What did seem to make a difference was putting air in the tyres to the correct amount, never thought to do this when we first picked it up as presumed they would be right. We now get around 25 MPG with steady driving.
Mandy
The following members of MHF thanked mandyandandy for this posting
I would imagine that its more to do with aerodynamics than engine type or power. My 140hp 2.5ltr Renault does 34-37mpg.
______________________________________________________________ Regards Frank
Get behind early - it gives you more time to catch up.
Denn wir haben nichts in die Welt gebracht; darum offenbar ist, wir werden auch nichts hinausbringen.
Plusnet, Safari 3.1, G5 PowerPC iMac running OSX 10.4.11 and Eee 4GB running Linux EeePC 1.02.15, Salisbury UK
The following members of MHF thanked sallytrafic for this posting
I would imagine that its more to do with aerodynamics than engine type or power. My 140hp 2.5ltr Renault does 34-37mpg.
I'm with Frank on this one.
Speed has by far the greatest influence on fuel consumption, and that (almost by definition) is due largely to the vehicle aerodynamics.
In "holiday dawdle" mode on pretty and quiet French minor roads I can get 40mpg by driving at 45 - 50mph.
70mph on the motorway drops the figure to around 26mpg, or less if there's a headwind.
Many motorhomes have the aerodynamics of a small bungalow, but within obvious limits their fuel economy can be quite dramatically improved by choosing lighter footwear.