You are a Guest, please Join now to allow full access to the website and be part of our community. You can register by clicking the "Click Here to create an account" link at the top left of the page under our Logo
The problem with SP3 not recognising 4gb RAM is a known issue:
Only registered users can see links on our Forum Join Now or Login
A lot of reading but, as I understand it, XP 32bit will not recognise 4gb ram.
64bit does, however, and from all accounts, runs much quicker than Vista. A post in the reply likens Vista with 4gb to running XP with 2gb.
Thank you for that. I do remember sometime ago problems with XP and 2gb but I am sure it was reporting 4gb as I cannot believe I have not looked at the reading in all this time. But hey, I am old and getting more stupid by the day so it is entirely possible. Now thinking where to go next.
______________________________________________________________ I´ve never had a date that I didn´t inflate.
The following members of MHF thanked Pusser for this posting
A staggering number of everyday programs will not run under it.
Including DOS- my historic DOS accounts going back 15 years? - Zilch!
Antivirus? The only one with 64bit capability is AVAST! - all the other household names? Nada!
Scanners? You'll be lucky!
And so the list goes on.....
I agree, to some extent, however, your info may be out of date as AVG is available for the 64bit platform.
Only registered users can see links on our Forum Join Now or Login
I have got most things working on my PC with 64bit XP running.
However, I was merely pointing out the fact that 64bit recognises the full RAM capacity. If the option was to go out and buy a 64bit XP or Vista, I would plump for Vista. Or, live with the reduced RAM.
I cannot live knowing I have only 3gb of ram so Vista here I come. Thank you for all the time and trouble explaining it to me.
______________________________________________________________ I´ve never had a date that I didn´t inflate.
The following members of MHF thanked Pusser for this posting
The problem with SP3 not recognising 4gb RAM is a known issue:
Only registered users can see links on our Forum Join Now or Login
A lot of reading but, as I understand it, XP 32bit will not recognise 4gb ram.
64bit does, however, and from all accounts, runs much quicker than Vista. A post in the reply likens Vista with 4gb to running XP with 2gb.
Thank you for that. I do remember sometime ago problems with XP and 2gb but I am sure it was reporting 4gb as I cannot believe I have not looked at the reading in all this time. But hey, I am old and getting more stupid by the day so it is entirely possible. Now thinking where to go next.
I am sure it WAS reading 4gb. The problem appears to manifest itself with the update to SP3.
______________________________________________________________ TIM
We had a terrible fight last night.....my wife asked me what was on the TV and I said "dust".
I treat every day as if it was my last. One day i will be right.
The following members of MHF thanked timbop37 for this posting
Vista (32 bit) can only see 3GB of RAM. You need the 64 bit version for 4GB or more...
I have found that provided you use the latest hardware Vista is stable so only put it on a new machine.
Oh, I've been using Vista (Business and Ultimate) for well over a year now and it still drives me to distraction I have restorted to installing Virtual PC with XP to do the things that Vista can't do properly or won't do thanks to those shortsighted pr&ts in the RIAA.
______________________________________________________________ Regards
John
Need an easy way to resize your Avatar? Try
Only registered users can see links on our Forum Join Now or Login
, its free!
Artificial Intelligence is no match for real stupidity!
Sent via the
Only registered users can see links on our Forum Join Now or Login
Satellite Internet System
The following members of MHF thanked JQL for this posting
As far as I know 32 bit versions of Vista have the same memory problems as Xp in that they cannot fully address 4GB. Vista service pack 1 has altered the way that the amount of memory is reported. People with 4gb were only shown with 3 - 3.5.
Apart from the fact that Vista takes twice the power to do what XP does it looks very nice.
Clean install of XP and upgrade to XP sp3 - you know it makes sense.
Regards
Herman
______________________________________________________________ A fanatic is one who canīt change his mind and wonīt change the subject.
The following members of MHF thanked Herman for this posting
As far as I know 32 bit versions of Vista have the same memory problems as Xp in that they cannot fully address 4GB. Vista service pack 1 has altered the way that the amount of memory is reported. People with 4gb were only shown with 3 - 3.5.
Apart from the fact that Vista takes twice the power to do what XP does it looks very nice.
Clean install of XP and upgrade to XP sp3 - you know it makes sense.
Regards
Herman
Many thanks and I suspect you are right. I have just had another bizarity with Svc pk 3. All my outlook express subfolders have either disappeared up their own backside or have become folders in their own right.
I have ordered a ready made box with Vista on it and while I am waiting I will do what you have said as having got Vista on a laptop I much prefer XP anyday of the week. I think I may simply go to svc pack 2 as I was happy with that. No issues and I know then I can find my cloaking device parts and time warp components so I can really thrash some aliens.
______________________________________________________________ I´ve never had a date that I didn´t inflate.
The following members of MHF thanked Pusser for this posting
Bookmarks
Watched Topics
I have restorted to installing Virtual PC with XP to do the things that Vista can't do properly or won't do thanks to those shortsighted pr&ts in the RIAA.
