www.outdoorbits.com

Sister shop to Motorhome Facts Motorhome Solar Panels
Motorhome Solar Panels

Outdoor Bits offer a wide range of solar panels at a competitive price with fitting available.

Motorhome Insurance

motorhome insurance quote online
Phone on 0208 9845311

Motorhome Insurance Quote

Campsite Reviews

Camping Buchholz Review Photo

Review of Camping Buchholz

German Campsite Germany

Full Details

Motorhome Garage

2005 Hymer Starline 680
2005 Hymer Starline 680 motorhome
Owned by thedoc
Updated 08/01/2011

2000 Hobby 750 FMSe
2000 Hobby 750 FMSe motorhome
Owned by raynipper
Updated 28/10/2011

2009 Carthargo Opus
2009 Carthargo Opus motorhome
Owned by wobby
Updated 20/12/2009

Motorhome Chat Rooms

Motorhome Chat

10 Chat Rooms
0 Members connected
0 members chatting

Chat Now

Motorhome Facts :: View topic - Privacy Laws

Advertise Here
Welcome to Motorhomefacts, we are a thriving motorhome community (Largest in Europe). Why Not JOIN NOW and get instant access to more of the website. It costs nothing to join and only takes a few minutes.
We have 200,000 different people visiting our site monthly and this amount of motorhomers in one place guarantees a fast response to any questions you may have. We also have unique facilities not found elsewhere such as our Online Logbook, stopover tracker, Motorhome directory with Ebay type feedback and the largest repository of motorhome campsites reviews found anywhere



Rally News Next Rally is @ Spring Bank Holiday at Hamble Primary School, Hamble, Southampton on 01/06/2012 in Hampshire

Tweet This Topic Facebook del.icio.us digg blogmarks Furl Reddit technorati Yahoo Google Chatting:  Chat Now View previous topic View next topic

Post new topic Reply to topic Printer-friendly version

 Privacy Laws
1057315 Post Posted: Thu May 12, 2011 9:02 pm Thank this member for this postReply with quote Back To Top

wackywyco Subscriber 07/07/2012 


Age: 63

Joined: Apr 30, 2007

Posts: 378

MH: Hymer B564L

Campsites

Gender: Male

Location: Norwich

isleofman.gif

Status: Offline

I guess this is one for Artona but any answer would be welcome. We were watching that art programme "Show me the Monet"on BBC
tonight and a large photograph of football fans was selected for the
exhibition and was subsequently sold for £2700. As a number of the people could be easily identified we wondered what the position is regarding the privacy of the subjects. It would have been impossible for the photographer to gain everyones permission, could any of them now raise an objection to being depicted in this manner? What is the ruling on this please?

______________________________________________________________
Cheers for now...Screams for later wave
 
1057656 Post Posted: Fri May 13, 2011 2:11 pm Thank this member for this postReply with quote Back To Top

EJB Subscriber 12/09/2012 


Joined: Aug 25, 2007

Posts: 2347

MH: Autotrail Tracker

Campsites

Gender: None specified

Location: Suffolk (By choice)

blank.gif

Status: Offline

The short answer is No!
The copyright belongs to the photographer to display in any reasonable way or sell on.
It's the same for TV etc.....ie. lots of passers-by caught on film Wink

______________________________________________________________
Ted.
I try and state simple facts in a nice way.
 
1057659 Post Posted: Fri May 13, 2011 2:15 pm Thank this member for this postReply with quote Back To Top

tonyt Subscriber 07/01/2013 


Joined: May 25, 2005

Posts: 4098

MH: Transit Connect Self Build

Campsites

Gender: None specified

southafrica.gif

Status: Offline

As far as I am aware, there are no privacy laws in this country providing the photographs or film is taken in a public place.

I'd be very interested if anyone knows otherwise.

______________________________________________________________
Tony
 
1057690 Post Posted: Fri May 13, 2011 3:08 pm Thank this member for this postReply with quote Back To Top

Andysam Subscriber 07/10/2012 


Age: 42

Joined: May 10, 2005

Posts: 1149

MH: 2008 Chausson Flash 03

Campsites

Gender: Male

Location: Sussex

england.gif

Status: Offline

That's correct. The only laws relate to authorities with investigative powers in certain circumstances. Otherwise it's a free for all!

______________________________________________________________
Satisfied now I´ve gotten rid of my Marquis supplied Autocruise- both were rubbish!
 
1057728 Post Posted: Fri May 13, 2011 4:14 pm Thank this member for this postReply with quote Back To Top

peribro Subscriber 09/11/2012 


Joined: Sep 06, 2009

Posts: 2369

MH: Autotrail Frontier Cherokee

Campsites

Gender: Male

Location: West Sussex

uk.gif

Status: Offline

Every time a live football match is televised, you see pictures of hundreds if not thousands of members of the crowd. I don't see any difference.
 
1057914 Post Posted: Fri May 13, 2011 9:10 pm Thank this member for this postReply with quote Back To Top

wackywyco Subscriber 07/07/2012 


Age: 63

Joined: Apr 30, 2007

Posts: 378

MH: Hymer B564L

Campsites

Gender: Male

Location: Norwich

isleofman.gif

Status: Offline

I understand what you mean Peribro, but the question was raised because the Photograph was sold for a lot of money. Could one of the subject people claim payment for inclusion or object to being depicted?

______________________________________________________________
Cheers for now...Screams for later wave
 
1057922 Post Posted: Fri May 13, 2011 9:23 pm Thank this member for this postReply with quote Back To Top

rosalan Subscriber 03/03/2013 


Age: 72

Joined: Aug 24, 2009

Posts: 1939

MH: Burstner Nexxo t660

Campsites

Gender: Male

Location: Beds

blank.gif

Status: Offline

Please, please NO! Surprised
We are getting litigation mad, one of the many unsavoury things to come out of the US of A.
No pictures of our children in school plays, no childrens faces on newsreels, Google has to hide any identifying features of faces or number plates. We are going mad with litigation.
How any of us survived childhood and adulthood when our pictures could be bandied about I am not sure but please make it stop.
Alan

______________________________________________________________
 
1057926 Post Posted: Fri May 13, 2011 9:30 pm Thank this member for this postReply with quote Back To Top

peribro Subscriber 09/11/2012 


Joined: Sep 06, 2009

Posts: 2369

MH: Autotrail Frontier Cherokee

Campsites

Gender: Male

Location: West Sussex

uk.gif

Status: Offline

wackywyco wrote:
I understand what you mean Peribro, but the question was raised because the Photograph was sold for a lot of money. Could one of the subject people claim payment for inclusion or object to being depicted?

I wouldn't have thought so but it would certainly be nice if it was possible. Football clubs, in conjunction with the FA and Sky, sell coverage of matches for enormous sums yet the crowd doesn't get paid. Or what about all the spectators along the route of the recent Royal Wedding? Many of them will have appeared on television and in pictures that appeared in papers and magazines.
However I'm only guessing as I know nothing about privacy, copyright etc etc so maybe someone more knowledgeable than me will prove me completely wrong! Smile
 
1057939 Post Posted: Fri May 13, 2011 9:50 pm Thank this member for this postReply with quote Back To Top

artona Linked Subscriber 12/01/2013 


Joined: Jan 19, 2006

Posts: 16543

MH: .

Campsites

Gender: None specified

uk.gif

Status: Offline

Its a while since I was a working as a pres photographer but at that time if you as the photographer was stood on public accessable land you were basically ok. You could stand on a public footpath and photograph someone stood on their doorstep for example.

however the same piece of public footpath did not give you a safe haven to photograph someone in their bedroom as then you could be prosecuted for being a peeping tom.

In sports stadiums these days there is normally a disclaimer on display to say photographs might be taken. This is generally to cover professionals working and taking photographs of minors. The parents have been warned and it is then upto them if they do not want to enter.

At Jessica's school the rules are totally relaxed again and parents are free to photograph the school plays etc. A few years ago we had possibly become over protective and such a thing was banned. However this was after the Soham school caretaker Huntley who had murdered the little girls so it was understandable.

stew
Members do not see the Adverts Below
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum
All times are GMT + 1 Hour  
Page 1 of 1  



Post new topic Reply to topic Printer-friendly version

Tweet This Topic Facebook del.icio.us digg blogmarks Furl Reddit technorati Yahoo Google Go to MAIN SITE Front Page