www.outdoorbits.com

Sister shop to Motorhome Facts Avtex W164DR Motorhome Television
Avtex W164DR 12V TV

A feature packed 12V TV for Motorhomers.

Motorhome Insurance

motorhome insurance quote online
Phone on 0208 9845311

Motorhome Insurance Quote

Campsite Reviews

Paralia Zacharo Review Photo

Review of Paralia Zacharo

Greek Campsite Greece

Full Details

Motorhome Garage

Motorhome Chat Rooms

Motorhome Chat

10 Chat Rooms
0 Members connected
0 members chatting

Chat Now

Motorhome Facts :: View topic - If you could only have one lens

Advertise Here
Welcome to Motorhomefacts, we are a thriving motorhome community (Largest in Europe). Why Not JOIN NOW and get instant access to more of the website. It costs nothing to join and only takes a few minutes.
We have 200,000 different people visiting our site monthly and this amount of motorhomers in one place guarantees a fast response to any questions you may have. We also have unique facilities not found elsewhere such as our Online Logbook, stopover tracker, Motorhome directory with Ebay type feedback and the largest repository of motorhome campsites reviews found anywhere



Rally News Next Rally is @ Spring Bank Holiday at Hamble Primary School, Hamble, Southampton on 01/06/2012 in Hampshire

Tweet This Topic Facebook del.icio.us digg blogmarks Furl Reddit technorati Yahoo Google Chatting:  Chat Now View previous topic View next topic

Post new topic Reply to topic Printer-friendly version

 If you could only have one lens
908608 Post Posted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 3:41 pm Thank this member for this postReply with quote Back To Top

Biglol Subscriber 24/07/2012 


Age: 64

Joined: Jul 16, 2007

Posts: 521

MH: A/S Executive GLS

Campsites

Gender: Male

Location: Devon

england.gif

Status: Offline

If you have a camera with inter-changeable lenses, like a DSLR, and you could only have one lens, what would it be ?

______________________________________________________________
BigLol..........

All done on a Big Mac, or iPad Smile
 
908609 Post Posted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 3:45 pm Thank this member for this postReply with quote Back To Top

KSH  


Joined: Apr 18, 2010

Posts: 192

MH: Compass drifter

Campsites

Gender: None specified

uk.gif

Status: Offline

My BIGma, Sigma 50-500, covers all areas then Smile
 
908628 Post Posted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 3:59 pm Thank this member for this postReply with quote Back To Top

EJB Subscriber 12/09/2012 


Joined: Aug 25, 2007

Posts: 2347

MH: Autotrail Tracker

Campsites

Gender: None specified

Location: Suffolk (By choice)

blank.gif

Status: Offline

28 to 200mm.

______________________________________________________________
Ted.
I try and state simple facts in a nice way.
 
908632 Post Posted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 4:10 pm Thank this member for this postReply with quote Back To Top

spindrifter  


Age: 67

Joined: Nov 14, 2006

Posts: 566

MH: compass castaway

Campsites

Gender: None specified

australia.gif

Status: Offline

28 to 135 - f/3.5-5.6.

More magnification = less light to coupler - wider aperature = less depth of field = slower shutter speed = higher ISO = more grain (noise) on and on and on.


David
 
908644 Post Posted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 4:20 pm Thank this member for this postReply with quote Back To Top

JeanLuc  


Joined: Jan 13, 2007

Posts: 1392

MH: Hymer B630 Star-Line

Campsites

Gender: None specified

Location: Warwickshire

uk.gif

Status: Offline

It would have to be a 17-55mm f2.8 constant maximum aperture like this one:
AFS Nikkor 17-55

It's a DX rather than FX format, but since I use a DX format camera, that's fine. It means the wide end is not quite as wide as I'd like at 25mm equivalent on a 135 format, but its range covers the most useful lengths.
Wide aperture means it is great in low light and for throwing backgrounds out of focus. Image quality is outstanding. The only downsides are weight and price.

Long lenses are nice, but more great pictures are taken with wide angles. (Unless you specialise in wildlife.)

In practice, I use an 18-70 for most shots (can't afford the one above), with the occasional use of an 80-200 f2.8, a 105mm f2.8 macro, and an old 50mm f1.8 for low light and portraits (equivalent to a very wide 75mm short tele).

Philip
 
908649 Post Posted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 4:22 pm Thank this member for this postReply with quote Back To Top

artona Linked Subscriber 12/01/2013 


Joined: Jan 19, 2006

Posts: 16543

MH: .

Campsites

Gender: None specified

uk.gif

Status: Offline

50mm F1.2

stew
 
908653 Post Posted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 4:27 pm Thank this member for this postReply with quote Back To Top

JeanLuc  


Joined: Jan 13, 2007

Posts: 1392

MH: Hymer B630 Star-Line

Campsites

Gender: None specified

Location: Warwickshire

uk.gif

Status: Offline

artona wrote:
50mm F1.2

stew


Now that's a photographer talking!
 
908658 Post Posted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 4:36 pm Thank this member for this postReply with quote Back To Top

artona Linked Subscriber 12/01/2013 


Joined: Jan 19, 2006

Posts: 16543

MH: .

Campsites

Gender: None specified

uk.gif

Status: Offline

I have gone totally prime lens JeanLuc.

I was finding zoom lenses were making me a lazy photographer. I have also gone totally manual focus, all nikkor.

My 50mm F1.2 is about thirty years old, although I only bought it a few weeks back but the images have a wow factor I could not get from a zoom lens.


stew
 
908662 Post Posted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 4:38 pm Thank this member for this postReply with quote Back To Top

CliveMott Subscriber 17/03/2013 


Age: 23

Joined: Mar 10, 2008

Posts: 2903

MH: Concorde Charisma

Campsites

Gender: Male

Location: New Milton Hants

england.gif

Status: Offline

Strugled with that dilema and eventually bought a "bridge" camera from Fuji. Lens is equivament to 24 - 720mm zoom, thats X 30

Cannot find anything Nikon or Canon do to even come close.
And it does HD video as well 1080 wide.

10 Megapixel.

C.
 
908677 Post Posted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 4:56 pm Thank this member for this postReply with quote Back To Top

JeanLuc  


Joined: Jan 13, 2007

Posts: 1392

MH: Hymer B630 Star-Line

Campsites

Gender: None specified

Location: Warwickshire

uk.gif

Status: Offline

I have to agree there is something deeply satisfying about using a prime lens. In the 135 days, I had only one zoom: the 80-200 f2.8.

Perhaps I should put on my 35mm f2 to give me a 50mm equivalent on the DX sensor, and see if I can get back to real photography again.

Philip

p.s. I'm not going back to manual focus as the eyesight is not as sharp as it was when squinting through the viewfinder. Autofocus (or at least focus confirmation) is something I rely on these days.
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Members do not see the Adverts Below
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum
All times are GMT + 1 Hour  
Page 1 of 2  
Goto page 1, 2  Next


Post new topic Reply to topic Printer-friendly version

Tweet This Topic Facebook del.icio.us digg blogmarks Furl Reddit technorati Yahoo Google Go to MAIN SITE Front Page